Back to top       ...

The Yoni Dance


A self-awareness story about life, love,
romance, and the intimate love arts.

Copyright  © 2001-2002   The Life Center   All rights reserved.     See:  Terms of Use


 Yoni Dance Book  --  Endnotes




Endnote # 1 --  Instructions and Advice

                               for the Young Bride

Endnote # 6  --  Pushing a Position

Endnote # 7  --  Government-Sponsored Violence

Endnote # 8  --  Sex or Violence--

                               It’s an Either or Choice



Endnote # 1

Instructions and Advice for the Young Bride

(Referenced from Book One  --  Chapter Eight

What Is a CLIC — CLI Circle Concepts and Guidelines



The following article, Instructions and Advice for the Young Bride, published in 1894, represents the roots of the American anti-sexual, religious fundamentalism.   Part of the original religious philosophy practiced in colonial America was that the more one suffered here on Earth, the greater would be the glory of God in heaven.  

Although the first settlers came to America to escape religious persecution, one of the first things these new settlers did was to set up their own brand of religious persecution against all who failed to follow the one-way my-way beliefs and practices that were dictated by the controllers of these new colonial settlements.   Thus, the present Christian beliefs in America have their origin, not in freedom of religion,  not in freedom from religion,  but rather in conformity to the rules dictated by the dominant males of the day.

Because parents are the foundation upon which children create their own lives, children pick up the vast majority of their values, beliefs, prejudices and their self-concepts (who they believe they are) from their parents.   Commonly adult beliefs are only a slight variation on the beliefs of their parents.   They in turn, pass on these values, beliefs, prejudices, and the like to their children, who in turn, pass them on to their children.   Thus traditions, beliefs, etcetera can and often do last for centuries.

Although most people today would consider the following article to be absurd, this type of anti-sexual thinking is still alive and well in the minds of those behind the right wing of the fundamentalist Christian, anti-abortion movement.





On the Conduct and Procedure

of the Intimate and Personal Relationships

of the Marriage State for the Greater Spiritual Sanctity

of this Blessed Sacrament and the Glory of God



Ruth Smythers,

beloved wife of The Reverend L. D. Smythers,

Pastor of the Arcadian Methodist Church

of the Eastern Regional Conference


Published in the year of our Lord 1894

Spiritual Guidance Press, New York City


To the sensitive young woman who has had the benefits of proper upbringing, the wedding day is, ironically, both the happiest and most terrifying day of her life.   On the positive side, there is the wedding itself, in which the bride is the central attraction in a beautiful and inspiring ceremony, symbolizing her triumph in securing a male to provide for all her needs for the rest of her life.   On the negative side, there is the wedding night, during which the bride must pay the piper, so to speak, by facing for the first time the terrible experience of sex.  

At this point, dear reader, let me concede one shocking truth.   Some young women actually anticipate the wedding night ordeal with curiosity and pleasure!   Beware such an attitude!   A selfish and sensual husband can easily take advantage of such a bride.   One cardinal rule of marriage should never be forgotten: GIVE LITTLE, GIVE SELDOM, AND ABOVE ALL, GIVE GRUDGINGLY.   Otherwise what could have been a proper marriage could become an orgy of sexual lust.   

On the other hand, the bride's terror need not be extreme.   While sex is at best revolting and at worse rather painful, it has to be endured, and has been by women since the beginning of time, and is compensated for by the monogamous home and by the children produced through it.  

It is useless, in most cases, for the bride to prevail upon the groom to forego the sexual initiation.   While the ideal husband would be one who would approach his bride only at her request and only for the purpose of begetting offspring, such nobility and unselfishness cannot be expected from the average man.  

Most men, if not denied, would demand sex almost every day.   The wise bride will permit a maximum of two brief sexual experiences weekly during the first months of marriage.   As time goes by she should make every effort to reduce this frequency.   Feigned illness, sleepiness, and headaches are among the wife's best friends in this matter.   Arguments, nagging, scolding, and bickering also prove very effective, if used in the late evening about an hour before the husband would normally commence his seduction.  

Clever wives are ever on the alert for new and better methods of denying and discouraging the amorous overtures of the husband.   A good wife should expect to have reduced sexual contacts to once a week by the end of the first year of marriage and to once a month by the end of the fifth year of marriage.  

By their tenth anniversary many wives have managed to complete their child bearing and have achieved the ultimate goal of terminating all sexual contacts with the husband.   By this time she can depend upon his love for the children and social pressures to hold the husband in the home.  

Just as she should be ever alert to keep the quantity of sex as low as possible, the wise bride will pay equal attention to limiting the kind and degree of sexual contacts.   Most men are by nature rather perverted, and if given half a chance, would engage in quite a variety of the most revolting practices.   These practices include among others performing the normal act in abnormal positions; mouthing the female body; and offering their own vile bodies to be mouthed in turn.  

Nudity, talking about sex, reading stories about sex, viewing photographs and drawings depicting or suggesting sex are the obnoxious habits the male is likely to acquire if permitted.   A wise bride will make it the goal never to allow her husband to see her unclothed body, and never allow him to display his unclothed body to her.   Sex, when it cannot be prevented, should be practiced only in total darkness.   Many women have found it useful to have thick cotton nightgowns for themselves and pajamas for their husbands.   These should be donned in separate rooms.   They need not be removed during the sex act.   Thus, a minimum of flesh is exposed.

Once the bride has donned her gown and turned off all the lights, she should lie quietly upon the bed and await her groom.   When he comes groping into the room she should make no sound to guide him in her direction, lest he take this as a sign of encouragement.   She should let him grope in the dark.   There is always the hope that he will stumble and incur some slight injury which she can use as an excuse to deny him sexual access.  

When he finds her, the wife should lie as still as possible.   Bodily motion on her part could be interpreted as sexual excitement by the optimistic husband.  

If he attempts to kiss her on the lips she should turn her head slightly so that the kiss falls harmlessly on her cheek instead.   If he attempts to kiss her hand, she should make a fist.   If he lifts her gown and attempts to kiss her anyplace else she should quickly pull the gown back in place, spring from the bed, and announce that nature calls her to the toilet.   This will generally dampen his desire to kiss in the forbidden territory.  

If the husband attempts to seduce her with lascivious talk, the wise wife will suddenly remember some trivial non-sexual question to ask him.   Once he answers she should keep the conversation going, no matter how frivolous it may seem at the time.  

Eventually, the husband will learn that if he insists on having sexual contact, he must get on with it without amorous embellishment.  

The wise wife will allow him to pull the gown up no farther than the waist, and only permit him to open the front of his pajamas to thus make connection.  

She will be absolutely silent or babble about her housework while his huffing and puffing away.   Above all, she will lie perfectly still and never under any circumstances grunt or groan while the act is in progress.   As soon as the husband has completed the act, the wise wife will start nagging him about various minor tasks she wishes him to perform on the morrow.   Many men obtain a major portion of their sexual satisfaction from the peaceful exhaustion immediately after the act is over.   Thus the wife must insure that there is no peace in this period for him to enjoy.   Otherwise, he might be encouraged to soon try for more.  

One heartening factor for which the wife can be grateful is the fact that the husband's home, school, church, and social environment have been working together all through his life to instill in him a deep sense of guilt in regards to his sexual feelings, so that he comes to the marriage couch apologetically and filled with shame, already half cowed and subdued.   The wise wife seizes upon this advantage and relentlessly pursues her goal first to limit, later to annihilate completely her husband's desire for sexual expression.









Endnote # 5

Let George Do It!

Referenced from Book 2   --  Chapter Twelve --- The Not-so-great Pretender


The first readers of this book said that the following piece should be left out because its inclusion would make the author look like a kook and an eccentric and a member of the lunatic fringe.  

Well, perhaps they are right, and we shouldn’t look at what is written below because, if the allegations set forth are actually true, then faith in our entire system of government becomes severely shaken.   And if we stopped believing in the fairy tales our governments regularly peddle to us, we just might demand the government represent the people instead of the ego-atheists who now rule the world with all but impunity towards the people.

In spite of the potential, negative label attached, the decision was to include the following as an endnote and let you, the reader decide.  Your comments are invited regarding this or anything else in this book.   Please contact us at the E-mail address found at the beginning and at the end of this book.

Let George Do It.

George W. Bush, the son of former President George Bush, Senior and another staunch anti-abortionist has been declared, by legal pigly wiggly, to be the next President of the United States.   And, it appears that George Junior either believes the anti-abortion fantasy or he has sold his soul to the anti-abortionist in exchange for their votes.

Another even more troubling aspect of this possibility is that George Junior is a chip off the old block.  Perhaps you are unaware that  the plan for him to become president is the most heavily financed political campaign in all of American history, and that plan has been in the works for a very long time.  

 Now you say “So what?” and think George Senior is a nice guy.   Well, perhaps he is, as long as you’re willing to forget his role in the Iran-Contra Scandal.   Although it was proven that he and Reagan secretly sold military hardware to Iran for the release of the American hostages, it was never proven that they bribed the Ayatollah Khomeini to hold those American Embassy hostages until after the 1980 election.

In case you have forgotten, the freedom or lack of freedom of those American hostages was the deciding factor in the 1980 Presidential election.   This was an extremely close race political race, and if the hostages were freed prior to the election, Jimmy Carter would win.   If they stayed in Iran until after the election, Reagan and Bush would win.   Thus, the Ayatollah Khomeini was in a power position with the capacity to decided which candidate would become the next President of the United Sates.

And there was George Senior in Iran at precisely the right time with the means, the motive, the opportunity, to bribe the Ayatollah.   Not only that, because of his CIA connections, he had the capacity to cover it all up under a cloak of government secrecy.   Talk about foxes in the hen house…

So, if George senior did, indeed, bribe the Ayatollah Khomeini, to hold the hostages until after the election, then he and Reagan indirectly but definitely stole the presidency of the United States from its rightful recipient, Nuclear physicists, and Nobel Peace Prize Winner, Jimmy Carter, and thus, drastically changed the course of human history.   And, do you suppose it’s just strange coincidence that the hostages came home from Iran on the very day that Ronald Reagan was sworn in as President of the United States?  

How do you ever find the truth in such a situation.   Well, you don’t for two reasons.   First because of the heinous nature and horrendous magnitude of the alleged crime.   If in fact, a crime did occur, then all evidence would have been carefully and systematically destroyed, and all participants and witnesses, with the exception of the very highest principals, would have had short life expectancies.  ***  

Just imagine for a moment how different the world would be today if the visionary and master-humanitarian, Jimmy Carter has been reelected President of the United States instead of the inept, ultra-conservative, anti-sexual, antiabortionist, Ronald Reagan and his buddy George Senior.  

And second, the truth in this case almost certainly went the way as the truth in the Kennedy assassination.   Why?   Because the people accused of committing the crimes are the very same ones who did the investigation to see if a crime occurred. (George Senior was the Director of the CIA for years.) 

So, if George Senior did in fact bribe the Ayatollah Khomeini, then George Junior is the son of a disgusting criminal and not simply the son of a former President.   But that’s present-day, American politics for you and that’s  present day, American justice for you as well.   That’s also the climate in which a staunch anti-abortionist and supporter of “Egg Rights,” George junior,  has ended up residing in the White House.   The “like father like son” description certainly seems to fit, for George Junior has followed faithfully in has father’s footsteps and also stolen the presidency from its rightful owner. 

Yes, I know stolen presidencies are scary as hell, so let’s just erase daddy’s possibility and juniors actuality from our minds.   Let’s instead, focus on something really important, like who won the ball game last night.

You’ve probably heard the pronouncement that people make when they don’t want to get involved in something.   They knowingly or unconsciously refer to the days of the first American President, George Washington.   They say, “Let George do it.”   Well we just manifested a second modern-day George in the worst possible way.   So turn around and bend over again.   There’s another George coming your way.   Yes,   “Let’s let George do it.”


If you doubt for even one second that those running the secret government won't revert to murder to accomplish their own ends, I invite you to look at the statistics regarding mysterious deaths of those close to the 1963 assassination of President Kennedy.



Endnote # 6

          1)   Pushing a Position

          2)  Lies, Deception, and Hidden Agendas

          3)  A Secret Society of Sex Perverts

Referenced from Book One   --  Chapter Ten --- 

More CLI Circle  Principles


Soon after I realized I was to write the book you are now reading, the following three, additional, relevant issues came to my attention. 


1)   Pushing a Position

I ask, "Jezebel, aren’t you peddling a position by having me write this book?”

She responded with, “By example, let me distinguish for you the difference between peddling (pushing) a position and offering information.

Pushing your position is demanding (under threat of massive political support against them) that elected officials vote to turn your personal religious beliefs into secular law.

Pushing your position is going on TV to peddle a particular set of beliefs and to solicit money to buy more air time to peddle those beliefs some more and to ask again for still more money.

Pushing your position is demanding, under threat of economic boycott, that a national, convenience-store chain stop carrying a particular magazine because you disapprove of it’s content.

On the other hand, writing a book, including a book describing CLI Circles, is simply making information available to those who are interested in receiving that information.   With The Yoni Dance book available, everybody has a little more truth and one more option to choose from.   Everyone is free to read the book or not read the book, and everyone is free to accept or reject the information offered in that book.

No demands of any kind whatsoever are being imposed on anyone; no one is pushing anyone to accept, believe, or practice anything; and, above all, unlike those who criticize our way of living, we are not attempting to influence who gets elected or who gets elected or appointed to public office, and we are not proposing the use of government sanctioned violence or threat of violence to force anyone to practice our personal beliefs.”

“Jezebel, back before I knew I was to write a book about the CLIC arts, you told my that you had no position to defend, no need to defend it, and no adversaries to defend it from.   What I’m hearing now sounds like you’re defend a position.”  

She responds with, “When I originally said I had no position to defend, that was completely accurate.   CLI Circles were a completely private concept.   However, when the CLIC concepts are published in a book, critics are bound to surface.   And just as they a have the right to be critical, I have the right to express a view that offers a response to their criticism.   If the criticisms are not responded to, those criticisms will be taken as fact.  

I ask,  “Why do you say that?”  

“Because most people do not think for themselves.   They believe whatever their revered leaders tell them to believe, even if it’s complete hogwash.   Let me share with you a classic example of just that.”  

“Yes, please do.”  

“In the 1988, Reagan /Dukakis presidential campaign, when the Reagan peddlers used the ‘L word’ label to imply that liberal was such an obscene word that it could not actually be spoken,  Mr. Dukakis completely blew that opportunity to clearly explain what liberal meant and to distinguish his own views from those of Mr. Reagan.   He did nothing and thus allowed his liberal status to be associated with the obscene.  

“So you are saying you will respond to any criticisms made about CLI Circles?”  

“Absolutely!   And the responses will be just as strong, just as long, and just a dirty as the critics accusations.”  

“Then you’ll be just as dirty as your accusers.”  

“In the present world, constructed the way it is, speaking only the gentle truth to the lie is not only foolhardy, it is suicidal.   When the wolves attack, you have two choices, fight or die.   For example, in the 2000 presidential campaign, both Bill Bradley and Senator McCain, claimed themselves to be too pure to sling back the mud that their opponents plastered all over them, and it cost both of them dearly.  


2)  Lies, Deception, and Hidden Agendas

Jezebel continues, “Another thing you might want to look at are the motives and the hidden agendas behind someone’s criticism."

“Can you give me an example, please.”

“Certainly, on ABC’s news program Nightline, on  February 18, 2000, George Bush publicly acknowledged that the only difference between his position in the abortion controversy and the position of John McCain is that Senator McCain is in favor of fetal tissue research and Mr. Bush is opposed to it.   So doesn’t it seem a bit strange that Pat Robinson, Ralph Reed, and the so-called pro life groups spent hundreds of thousands of dollars in PAC money in the South Carolina primary badmouthing John McCain and promoting George Bush?”  

I say, “Yes, that does seem strange.   McCain is against legal abortions and that’s exactly the kind of politician that Pat Robinson and the fundamentalist Christians claim they want.” 

“In spite of Senator McCain’s 17 year pro-life voting record, and in spite of Mr. Bush’s public acknowledgment that their positions on abortion are harmonious, Pat Robinson, Ralph Reed, and the so-called pro life groups are publicly proclaiming that Senator McCain is not really pro-life.”

“So what’s their real reason.”

The real reason for their opposition to Senator McCain is that McCain is promoting campaign reform which would severely restrict all the big-money-interests, including the fundamentalist Christians, in their practice of attempting buy politicians and political elections.

Exit poles at the February 19, 2000, North Carolina, Republican primary election indicated that the voters based their votes mainly on three issues, abortion, taxes and morality.   On such issues, it is absolutely amazing that the majority of voters thought that Mr. Bush was the better candidate.

But then, it should be of no surprise that lies, deceptions and big money won out once again.   Bush and the anti-abortionists spent millions of dollars badmouthing McCain in any way they could imagine.

That really doesn’t say much for the public’s ability to see beyond the surface garbage that was peddled by the right wing fundamentalist Christians and by the Bush campaign itself."


          3)  A Secret Society of Sex Perverts

The third issue is an accusation that is sure to be thrown at the CLICs.   I suggested to Jezebel that we answer the accusation before it is even made.   I tell her that sooner or later, an anti-sexual do-gooder is going to stand up in front of a television camera before, countless thousands of viewers, denounce  CLICs as a secret society of sexual perverts.   Here is Jezebel’s response.

“First, you have to consider the mentality of a person who would make such an absurd statement.   Sharing sex with a partner is a normal, natural, healthy thing to do.   Denying one's sexual nature is far more perverse than acknowledging it.   Those who label healthy sex as perverse are simply denying their own sexual nature.   Their denial comes out in the form of an obsession about controlling someone else's sexual behavior.

In the once "Banned in America" book, Lady Chatterley's Lover, the author, D. H. Lawrence, addressed this issue head on.   Here's the essence of what he said,  "Folks should pay more attention to their own fucking, then they wouldn't want to listening to a lot of mouthfart about someone else's." *** 

Second,  a secret society implies that there is something illegal, immoral, fraudulent, or unethical that needs to be kept hidden.   Publishing a book certainly makes the concept of CLI Circles anything but secret, and there is absolutely nothing illegal, immoral, fraudulent, or unethical about CLI Circles.

Third, a secret society also implies exclusivity.   It implies that some are let in and others rejected.   With regard to CLICs, this is definitely not so.   Any one can create a CLIC at any time and do anything they want within it.   For example, there is a CLI Circle in a retirement home in Minnesota where there is no sexual touching at all.   The members simply get together to comfort one another with emotional support and with each other’s loving touch.

In a CLI Circle, there definitely is a significant amount of discretion used in keeping the private behavior of consulting adults private.”

I ask, “Why all the concern about keep personal behavior private?

Jezebel replies,  “Just look at President Clinton.   His behavior is the same as about 100,000,000 other Americans who have also had extramarital sexual encounters, including the recent Presidents, Theodore Roosevelt,  John Kennedy,  and Lyndon Johnson and going all the way back to Thomas Jefferson.   This also including countless religious do-gooders who have publicly preach restrictive sexual behavior and then secretly practice what they preach against.

And yet, the right wing, political cutthroats and the religious do-gooders have joined forces and used this issue to all but destroyed a very competent, American President, a man who is probably the greatest master of the political process that this country has ever known.

They couldn’t care less about President Clinton’s sexual behavior.   This was merely another hypocritical scam designed to embarrass the president and win support for themselves.

It doesn’t take much looking to see their scam and their hypocrisy.   Newt Gingrich, (the Republican Speaker of the House of Representatives)  the man who spearhead the anti sexual,  anti Clinton. impeachment campaign was secretly having an extramarital affair at the same time he was publicly condemning President Clinton’s behavior.

When the Gingrich hypocrisy was exposed, the Republicans chose the prominent Republican leader   ______ ______ , to replace Gingrich.    ______ ______ , was never able to assume the powerful position as the Republican Speaker of the House of Representatives because he, too, was caught in an adulterous affair.

So you can see that in such a ridiculous and hypocritical, political and social environment, it is important for CLI Circle members to keep their personal behavior private.

With regard to sexual perversion, you have only to go the Catholic Church to find one of the worlds weirdest sexual perversions -- sexual abstinence by those who have a normal, healthy sexual desires.

All the secret sex, including an astounding mount of homosexuality, that has scandalized the Catholic Church in recent years is another good example that the “Just Say No” campaign of the right wing anti-sexuals is a ridiculous unworkable illusion.”


Lady Chatterley’s Lover   by D. H. Lawrence,  Nelson Doubleday, Inc.  Garden City, N. Y.  1928.   The text paraphrased is from page 277 of the third manuscript version, published in Florence, Italy in 1928 by Orioli.



Endnote # 7 

Government-Sponsored Violence

Referenced from Book One   --  Chapter Thirteen --- The Universal Law of Allowing


The nature of governments and government- sponsored violence is indeed, another story for another time.   Until that other time,  here’s a list of some of the major illusions that precipitate mass violence:  


The illusion of scarcity -- in order for one person  (or group of people)  to have something, someone else must go without. 


The illusion that what is is inevitable -- that it can't be any other way -- that there is just no other solution. 


The illusion that violence solves problems.


The illusion that what is wrong for an individual to do is somehow made right if a group of people do it.  


The illusion that  (in relationship to our group’s beliefs and practices, which are, of course, the normal and correct ones)   everyone else’s beliefs and practices are deviant, strange, wrong, and threatening to us.


The illusion of victim consciousness -- someone out there is responsible for my problems.  


The illusion that humans beings can be trusted with unsupervised power.


The illusion that we can have a free society while government activity is cloaked in secrecy.

As was said many years ago,  


“Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”  

Who oversees the overseers?   Who watches over the watchers?   Who polices the police?   Who governs the government?   


Nobody!   S0 is it surprising that almost every unsupervised or secret government undertaking is riddled with corruption?    Is it surprising that secret government agencies become the major peddler of the crimes they are supposed to prevent?   It’s the nature of governments.   It’s the nature of human beings, and until we wake up and realize what’s actually happening right under our noses, we will continue to be used by our so-called leaders.

The illusions listed above promote divisiveness;  they promote the us-against-them  mentality;  and they promote the building of armed camps and wasting half of all human resources in building implements of violence and war.  

Instead of asking questions like,  “How can we make these seeming-enemies our friends?”   “How can we fulfill their needs so they will help us fill ours?”   “How can we feel safe in their presence?”   We ask questions like,   “How can we protect ourselves from these bad people?”   “How can we take what they have?”   and   “How can we destroy them?”

As an example of these eight illusions in action,  read the story of Joseph Smith, a very loving, and spiritual man who founded the Mormon Religion.   In reading about his life, you’ll clearly see how the above illusions were used to justify murdering him.  

In the greater reality of things, you and I, and everyone else are all part of one, united, interactive body.   We call  that body humanity.   We cannot expect to be prosperous while our neighbors live in poverty any more than we can expect to go out to dinner and leave our left arm at home.   Humanity is by its very nature a collective society, and no matter where we go, we're all going there together.   As our global society evolves, it becomes more and more apparent that we must choose between these two possibilities -- either we're all going to live together or we're all going to die together.



Endnote # 8

Sex or Violence--It’s an Either or Choice 

Referenced from Book One   --  Chapter Thirty-one --- The Awakening


The following material is quoted directly from the soon-to-be-published, 350-page book by this author:   An Interview with The Devil -- Exposing and Examining the Hidden and Previously Ignored Aspects of the Abortion Controversy.   <>


Big D    Your anti-abortionist friends are among the easiest of human beings to con because they rarely, if ever, think for themselves.   They’re trained to believe and conform to whatever the church leader tells them.   In their ardent anti-sexuality, they feed me most of my energy.   If sexuality was left as a private matter, I'd do very little business.   I’d even have trouble controlling and manipulating my war peddlers.

T.L.C.   Why?   What do you mean?

Big D   Wherever sexual expression is repressed, physical or emotional violence erupts.

T.L.C.   Why’s that so?

Big D   Stoney, would you rather make love or make war?

T.L.C.   Make love, of course.

Big D   And so would almost everyone else.   Without restricting sexual expression, the dominator-manipulators would find very few people willing to participate in making war.   Most people simply want to be left alone to do as they choose.

T.L.C.   So how are sex and violence related?

Big D   In terms of expressing basic life energy, sex and violence are at opposite poles; that is, they’re opposite ways of expressing the same, basic life energy.   Basic life energy is similar to a river in that you can divert its course, but you can't stop its flow.   So in order to create chaos, I simply manipulate my do-do-doers into promoting sexual repression, and then The Universal Law of Indestructible Energy does the rest.   

T.L.C.   Let me say this back to you and see if I’ve got it right.

Big D   OK.

T.L.C.   Are you saying that you’ve tricked the anti-abortionists into promoting sexual repression because it eliminates or greatly inhibits the expressing and sharing of love, joy, laughter, peace, happiness, contentment, bliss, etc.?

Big D   Yup, I confess.   It’s true.   But, I’ve not limited my sexual repression ploy to just our anti-abortionist friends.   I’ve fooled millions of others also!

T.L.C.   I’m not at all surprised at that, but let me continue so I can be sure I’ve got this correct.   You’ve peddled sexual repression and millions have bought your story.

Big D   Yes.

T.L.C.   And, as a result, many more millions of people are sexually unfulfilled.

Big D   Yes.

T.L.C.   And sexually unfulfilled people are less cooperative, less intimate, less loving, less creative, less tolerant of others, and much more willing to argue and fight, to kill each other, and to destroy things?

Big D   Yes.

T.L.C.   And this increases frustration, sadness, depression, sickness, disease, accidents, anger, hostility, and personal violence.

Big D   Yes, again.

T.L.C.   And this, in turn, promotes chaos, collective violence [wars] and a perpetuation of dominator-manipulator, totalitarian governments.

Big D   Stoney, you've got it totally!   I couldn’t have said it better myself.   Apparently you've noticed the commonly expressed love affair between sexual freedom and political freedom.

T.L.C.   And I’m also aware of the all-too-common, perverted copulation between sexual repression and dominator totalitarian politics.

Big D   Your smart-ass talk is beginning to make me like you.

I let that remark go by as if I hadn't heard it.






Back to the top of this page

Home Page      Site Map


pink shinny bullet    Is Personal Success Coaching for You?    pink shinny bullet    Experience  Timeless Truths & Wisdom    pink shinny bullet


The Yoni Dance


Copyright  © 2001-2002   The Life Center  

All rights reserved.     See:  Terms of Use


Yoni Dance - Book Two - Endnotes